You are not logged in.
Thanks for clarifying that.
Offline
Anti Omicron. The Anti Spike sigil at
https://forum.loohan.com/viewtopic.php?pid=20879#p20879
does not work on the Omicron variant. This one does (although, of course, it is not intended to diagnose or cure any illness -- please see your pharma distribution professional for that).
PDF CAD version:
https://loohan.com/Symbol_PDFs/omicron_sigil.pdf
Online
A reader sent this in. I had not noticed the similarity, despite having drawn many Om symbols in years past.
Online
I drew this sigil today.
I would like you to tell me what you feel about it. I don't tell what it feels to me, so that i don't influence your own perceptions.
thanks.
. .. Ok, you people! Sit tight, hold the fort and keep the home fires burning. And if I’m not back by dawn... call the president.. .
Offline
Hey! Sorry, just now seeing your post. Very cool sigil! I haven't looked at it long, but it gives me a feeling of organization, like a "switch" that flicks things into more organized states. Almost like it folds and stacks them into neat piles.
There's more to it, but I'd need more time. Looking forward to the PDF version. I'll be happy to test it further.
Website: https://www.aetheric.org
Bastion community: bastion.mn.co
Offline
Offline
If i print multiple copies of sigil on single piece of A4 paper and then put different people on each one, is there any diminishing effect and should they be cut separately?
Also, is anti-spike sigil effective remotely (putting pic of a person on it face to face) or is it just for direct use?
Offline
If i print multiple copies of sigil on single piece of A4 paper and then put different people on each one, is there any diminishing effect and should they be cut separately?
Also, is anti-spike sigil effective remotely (putting pic of a person on it face to face) or is it just for direct use?
It should work fine with the multiple copies.
Good question about remote use. I know that some, like the anti-spike and anti black goo ones, need to be close to the person and facing them.
Maybe later i will go thru them all and see which ones can be used remotely.
Online
There is a new strain of Covid out that the earlier sigils don't work on:
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid … rus-strain
so i modified it:
PDF CAD version:
https://loohan.com/Symbol_PDFs/antiEG5covid.pdf
Online
There is also now a JN.1:
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/jn1-c … iant-covid
The original anti-spike pic works on this.
https://www.loohan.com/Symbol_PDFs/anti … rotein.pdf
Online
New sigil. This was Joe's idea: a symbol to assist people in connecting to ChemmerBuster
https://loohan.com/ChemmerBuster.htm
to get their stuff programmed (or to whine about the sky i guess).
Joe started it and i finished it (mostly the pock-marks).
CAD version:
https://loohan.com/Symbol_PDFs/CBer.symbol.pdf
Online
Regarding the directory, It seems to be the desired new normal behavior of directories access, why giving curious humans too much freedom anyway?
It used to work perfectly well for the whole interwebs before that.I stumbled upon a technical description about this default policy on the .htaccess of apache server for hosting :
htaccessLinode wrote:Restrict Directory Listings
By default, someone visiting your website can view the directory and file structure, and gain access to files on the web server.
It’s best practice to restrict directory access, so that a visitor to example.com would have to be familiar with files on the server in order to see them.
One way you can restrict this is through .htaccess.Virtual hosting is now producing its own independent layer of bureaucratic rules ("best practices"), less controlled by human site admins, where people need to be familiar with files in directories.
A step towards "need to know" information restriction.
It should work now.
https://loohan.com/Symbol_PDFs/
Turns out i had put a small s in the links, and the folder has a large S. Or maybe at some time i changed the case of the S in the folder. Anyway, many of the direct links to its contents did not work either. I have fixed the links. I think. Let me know if anyone stumbles across any of the links which do not work.
Online
I'm glad it was just a technical issue.
Last edited by BlueBapho (2024-03-18 19:02:24)
Offline