You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I was re-reading this
http://loohan.com/otb16.htm
Archie says epoxy will hold just slightly more charge than polyester) seems distinctly superior to quartz, and cheaper.
I've tested in the past differences with the LM3 meter, and in same identical size of same program I got a little more readings on epoxy than polyester.
Unfortunately epoxy is way expansive in my country :-(
I think I will take some to do some new stuff for home
LM3 meter is the one of this video (not my video lol )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJP_DbcNU8U
by heliognosis (actually they sells the LM4 a newer and portable version) https://www.heliognosis.com/
Anyway, some other differences between the 2?
on other forums they says that epoxy does shrink less, like 2% while poly 4% and this results in metal inside vibrating more on epoxy and crystal being under more pressure on poly. Also maybe it just my case but epoxy seems to adhere better to materials....
Offline
I had completely forgotten about poly supposedly holding less charge. I am surprised. The difference can't be much.
I don't believe this stuff about pressure on ingredients caused by resin curing, nor that this would make for better output if it did work.
Offline
And I just realized that maybe the difference in charge can be due to the time of curing.
if orgone does accumulate with time, then it makes sense that epoxy, during 24 hours does take a bit more charge than poly curing in 1 to 4 hours.
Does make sense.
I think I will try to pour inside an accumulator that I'm in program to build, just for fun and see what will come out. Will try water pgm.
Offline
Pages: 1